Looking for an alternative to Float? While Float excels in resource management with its intuitive interface and real-time updates, it might not cater to every team's specific needs.
If you're seeking more comprehensive project management features, enhanced reporting capabilities, or better integration options, exploring other resource management tools could be beneficial.
Asana excels in task management and team collaboration, offering a more flexible and detailed approach than Float. While Float is great for resource planning, Asana's robust features make it ideal for comprehensive project management.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$10.99 per month per userSmartsheet offers comprehensive project management and collaboration tools, while Float excels in resource scheduling. Smartsheet's flexibility and automation make it ideal for complex projects, whereas Float is perfect for straightforward resource management.
Free plan?
NoStarting price
$9 per month per userProductive offers a comprehensive project management suite, while Float excels in resource scheduling. Productive's all-in-one approach is ideal for teams needing integrated budgeting and time tracking, whereas Float is perfect for focused scheduling needs.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$9 per monthRunn offers comprehensive project analytics and real-time forecasting, while Float excels in scheduling simplicity. Runn's intuitive interface and integration capabilities make it a versatile choice for teams seeking detailed insights and strategic planning.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$8 per month per userHub Planner offers detailed resource management and project planning, while Float is more streamlined and user-friendly. Hub Planner is ideal for complex projects, whereas Float suits teams seeking simplicity and ease of use.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$7 per monthTeamdeck excels in resource management and time tracking, offering a more comprehensive solution than Float. While Float is great for scheduling, Teamdeck's additional features make it ideal for teams needing a holistic approach to resource planning.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$2 per monthResource Guru excels in resource management and scheduling, offering a user-friendly interface and robust features. While Float focuses on project management, Resource Guru provides superior resource allocation tools, making it ideal for teams prioritizing efficient scheduling.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$4.16 per month per userFloat is renowned for its intuitive resource management, but as your team grows, you might need more robust features. Finding an alternative that overcomes Float's limitations—while offering enhanced reporting, integration, and customization—can set your projects up for long-term success. Here are the essential factors to consider when evaluating Float alternatives.
Seek tools that offer comprehensive reporting capabilities, allowing you to generate detailed insights into project progress, resource utilization, and financial metrics. The best alternatives should provide customizable reports and dashboards for better decision-making.
Choose platforms that seamlessly integrate with your existing tools and systems, such as CRM, accounting, and communication software. This ensures a smooth workflow and eliminates the need for manual data entry.
Opt for tools that allow you to tailor the interface and features to suit your team's specific needs. Look for options that offer custom fields, workflows, and templates for a personalized experience.
As your team or business grows, ensure the tool can scale with you. Look for solutions that support an increasing number of users, projects, and resources without compromising performance.
A clean and intuitive interface is crucial for user adoption. Choose tools that are easy to navigate and require minimal training, ensuring your team can get up and running quickly.
Martin Lunendonk
Martin Lunendonk is a senior tech writer specializing in website builders, web hosting, and ecommerce platforms. With a background in finance, accounting, and philosophy, he has founded multiple tech startups and worked in medium to large tech companies and investment banking, bringing deep expertise and reliable insights to his software reviews.